Or . . .
Check the newspaper platforming Palestinian push back that hasn't really resonated amongst locals and is mostly comprised of extreme progressive talking points . . . Here's the op/ed argument:
"Missouri is considering bills that would flatten this distinction. House Bills 746 and 937 would adopt a definition of antisemitism that has been widely criticized, including by one its original authors, as a dangerous conflation of antisemitism and criticism of Israel.
"If adopted, Missouri educational institutions would be required to add the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of the term into codes of conduct as a basis for investigating suspected acts of antisemitism. Alarmingly, this includes so-called “examples” of antisemitism, most involving criticism of Israel. Under these bills, the discussion of Palestinians’ lived experiences, academic findings critical of Israel’s government or even quotes from Israelis that condemn their nation’s actions could all be considered “prohibited conduct as it relates specifically to antisemitism.” They could lead to student suspensions and loss of scholarships, faculty denial of tenure, loss of research funding, or firing or defunding student organizations — all while doing nothing to make Jewish communities safer, as the bills claim to do . . ."
Read more via www.TonysKansasCity.com link . . .
Missouri leaders falsely confuse criticism of Israel's government with antisemitism | Opinion
Bills in Jefferson City would censor free speech, while doing nothing to protect either Palestinian or Jewish people. | Opinion