Jackson County Exec Shoots Down Legislature Gun Restrictions

An evening update sent to www.TonysKansasCity.com and other local media deserves attention because it seems to reveal A LOT about the state of local politics and how a "blue city" moves forward after a resounding shift in national politics . . . Our quick hot take . . . The Exec cites Missouri law in his decision . . . HOWEVER . . . We might be getting our first glimpse at local politicos taking a more conservative turn after recent election returns. 

Now here's the word . . .

Jackson County Executive vetoes gun restriction ordinance

White cites legislation as unlawful and reaffirms commitment to public safety through sustainable, legal solutions

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – County Executive Frank White, Jr. has exercised his veto power against Ordinance 5865, a proposed measure targeting firearm regulations within Jackson County. Citing significant legal conflicts and impracticalities, White returned the ordinance to the Jackson County Legislature, explaining in a formal veto message that it “remains fundamentally flawed, unlawful, and counterproductive.”

In a statement addressed to the Jackson County Legislature, County Executive White emphasized the ordinance’s conflict with Missouri’s preemption law, which prohibits local jurisdictions from imposing firearms regulations that go beyond state law. The County Counselor’s Office advised that Ordinance 5865 would likely prompt costly litigation from the state, specifically from the Missouri Attorney General’s Office, which would burden Jackson County taxpayers without yielding tangible benefits for public safety.

“While I am steadfast in my commitment to protecting our community, I cannot support legislation that is unlawful, unenforceable and exposes Jackson County to costly legal battles,” said White. “I have never hesitated to challenge the state when it serves the public interest, as evidenced by our prior opposition to House Bill 85, but we must ensure that our actions are both necessary and legally sound.”

Key Concerns in Veto Message

 1. Violation of State Preemption Laws and Financial Consequences: Ordinance 5865 disregards state law by attempting to impose firearm restrictions that are not supported by Missouri or federal statutes. The County Counselor warned that this would make the ordinance unenforceable and expose Jackson County to inevitable legal challenges, potentially leading to a significant drain on taxpayer resources.

2. Contradictory Provisions: Ordinance 5865 would introduce confusing discrepancies in firearm restrictions, allowing minors under 18 to use firearms in certain circumstances while prohibiting young adults aged 18-20 from similar lawful activities, such as hunting or target shooting.

3. Inconsistent Restrictions on Firearm Purchases and Use: Ordinance 5865 conflicts with both federal and state laws concerning handgun and ammunition purchases for individuals under 21, further undermining its enforceability and public safety objectives.

4. Unenforceable Restrictions on Semiautomatic Assault Rifles: Ordinance 5865’s restrictions on semiautomatic assault rifles for young adults aged 18-20 contradict existing state preemption statutes, which makes enforcement impossible and invites unnecessary legal challenges.

County Executive White reiterated his commitment to advancing lawful and effective public safety measures. He pointed to Kansas City’s firearm code as a viable model for Jackson County, noting that it aligns with state preemption laws, offers clear definitions and includes enforceable provisions without legal overreach. White encouraged the Legislature to explore a similar approach that respects legal boundaries and upholds public trust.

“I urge the Legislature to reconsider this ordinance and to focus on sustainable, common-sense public safety initiatives that do not conflict with state law,” said White. “Jackson County deserves policies that are effective, responsible and avoid needless litigation.”
##############

Developing . . .