CONVICTED KILLER LISA MONTGOMERY WINS STAY OF EXECUTION!!! FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS COMPETENCY HEARING!!!

Once again the justice system offers a local killer far more mercy and consideration than was afforded to Bobbie Jo Stinnett when Lisa Montgomery brutally murdered her and cut a baby out of her womb.

Accordingly, here's the latest legal update and a decision amid outcry for both mercy and justice . . . Read more: 

Fox4: Lisa Montgomery granted stay of execution hours before scheduled to be put to death

KCTV5: Federal judge grants stay of execution for Lisa Montgomery pending competence hearing

Fox4: Friends call for 'Justice for Bobbie Jo' as attorneys ask to spare Lisa Montgomery's life

Developing . . .

Comments

  1. They need to show the carved up body of the victim. Perhaps people wouldn't be so worried about a killer and her glamour shots of 25 years ago. Just a guess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ted Bundy had charming photos as well. She's a heinous killer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hold a National Lottery, $5/ticket, with the winner getting to flip the switch on this Bitch!
    You'll put a pretty good dent in our exploded Deficit!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Civilized countries don't execute people who are batshit crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is this considered pro-life? Asking for a friend?

    If not, maybe if Lisa was just aborted back in the day we could've saved Bobbie Jo?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Retroactive abortion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 8:26, she had the opportunity to prove mental defect at trial. This is just another arrogant jurist who thinks he's so much smarter than the jury that he can overrule them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Simple give her a fyckjng brain scan STFU! If she is actually brain damaged as claimed a scan should prove it definitively yes or no.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Right. She gets a stay of execution but the federal courts would not even look at evidence justifying a forensic audit of votes in the last general election.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ^^ Federal Courts didn't need to look at additional evidence, all they had to do was examine the evidence (or lack thereof) that had been presented to lower Courts. That's what the Appelate Pocess is.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lower (District) courts are federal courts too. And the rulings were based on lack of standing not a review of evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am sure a women that cuts a baby from her freshly murder mother was mentally sound at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well, @10:37, is is your contention that EVERY case brought in District Federal Courts was dismissed for lack of standing? Just asking.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 11:55 I trust you're being sarcastic. You can say that about every murderer and let them off the hook. The Charles Manson clan did about the same thing to Sharon Tate. They should all be in Hell by now, but they're still hanging around on the taxpayer's dime in California.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 7:16 and 7:50, the "glamour shot" is of the victim, not the killer.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Nut, crazy or what. She deserves to be executed for what she did. More Democrat garbage putting criminals ahead of the American legal citizens. It needs to end now. Criminals need to be punished for their crimes not protected, honored or set free!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management