TKC BREAKING AND EXCLUSIVE NEWS!!! KANSAS CITY INSIDERS QUESTION SECURITY STRATEGY: WHY WAS BOMB THREAT FLIGHT DIVERTED TO KCI?!?!



In the aftermath of a more substantial bomb threat than the average dud . . . There's a bit of Kansas City controversy to report.

Check it:

KICK-ASS KANSAS CITY INSIDERS QUESTION THE DECISION TO DIVERT A BOMB THREAT AIRPLANE BACK TO THIS COWTOWN!!!



Here's the word:

"Why did that bomb threat flight divert to KCI?"

Here's the money line . . .

"It was almost to Chicago and turned around. Was it weather or something else? Milwaukee and Minneapolis were still closer, no weather and would have been closer to JFK once they took off. The newspaper won't think to ask any questions so I thought you might want to."

Take a look at the big picture that CONFIRMS the suspicions of insiders:



Again, what's important here is to ASK THE QUESTION that so many other news outlets are dismissing in an attempt to have an "adult discussion" of airport matters and safety while so many other mainstream media outlets would rather stay silent on controversial KCI topics.

Developing . . .

Comments

  1. David Ferrie1/6/14, 10:50 AM

    Clearly, the conspiracy is that THEY need to blow-up the airport so they can build a new one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nah, it was because that if it turned out to be a big one and leveled all of KC, it wouldn't be that big a loss.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cause if the plane blew up around here the body parts would be easier to find in those open fields up by KCI.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe it's because KCI is a small airport and wouldn't cause much of a disruption to air travel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If it was a remotely creditable bomb threat, a diversion for a coast to coast flight to KC, normally not home to a plane like a 767, would throw someone with a malicious intent. Also with lower volume yet capacity to have a plane of that size land made it a good spot. Airports/cities usually don't get a choice in these situations, it's the FAA and DHS' call.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 11:13 has delivered a reasonable and adult comment, but I still like the 10:50 response.

    We are so used to bullshit and lies in KC, it's difficult to be an adult.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Runway length, availability of emergency services, availability of repair services. In that order.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's because we have the most black helicopters here to monitor people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. umm, well, let's see. O'Hare (and Milwaukee and Minneapolis) were kinda busy cancelling flights due to the impending snowstorm. KCI didn't have that issue, and was the ONLY airport in the vicinity able to take care of a 767.
    Geez..TKC "Insiders" need to find a hobby, now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It was an inside job to bring attention to single terminal

    ReplyDelete
  11. I wonder what that cost

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jeeze, running out of conspiracy stories?

    TKC insider=I pulled this out of my ass and wanted to sound important.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If I am in a similar situation, I want TKC and a cache of snivelers making decisions on these matters.

    Oh, make sure we solicit the cum on tits perv.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You know, I also wonder how you can have an "adult discussion" based on information provided by "kickass Kansas City insiders."

    ReplyDelete
  15. You're all wrong.
    They didn't look at the gas gauge when the left the coast and were running low on gas.
    They made up the bomb story so as not to look stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  16. NSA don't want people carrying flash drives on board.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The only inside TKC knows is Alonzo's rectum.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe they should outlaw flash drives?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then only criminals will use flash drives. You need to be patriotic and store everything in cloud-based services so the nsa can read it.

      Delete
  19. 11:42 and 11:47, you don't know what you're talking about.

    It was right near the Quad City airport when it diverted. It could have easily landed there.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Could have also used Milwaukee.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Do you really think Tony's map is perfectly to scale and shows the precise location of the plane when it turned around?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Because you don't land a threatened plane and disrupt traffic for two hours at a major hub like Chicago. You divert it to Kansas City where things won't get disruption on a national scale.

    OK? HAPPY?

    Wow. There IS always more and it IS always worse.

    ReplyDelete
  23. "It was right near the Quad City airport when it diverted. It could have easily landed there."

    Right. Could have just dropped right out of the sky from 30K at 300 miles per hour and landed at the airport it was "right near."



    ReplyDelete
  24. Interesting too how it was off the flight plan pretty much the entire trip and then as soon as it got back on it, turned around.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Only a matter of time before Van Loh comes out and says we need to build a new terminal so that we can have a Wendy's waiting for the next one.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 4:14. Haha!

    ReplyDelete
  27. 4:14. That isn't "Tony's map". It's from FlightAware and it is VERY accurate in its information.

    It diverted its course at 1:46 pm while at an altitude of 37,000 feet and travelling 544 mph. It's position at the time of the diversion was -89.8961 Longitude and 41.5314 Latitude. That would make it about 30 miles east northeast of the Quad Cities airport when it diverted.

    ReplyDelete
  28. http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AAL24/history/20140105/1505Z/KSFO/KMCI

    AND

    http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AAL24/history/20140105/1505Z/KSFO/KMCI/tracklog

    ReplyDelete
  29. What morons think a thumb-drive is a bomb?

    ReplyDelete
  30. It doens't occur to anyone that local tv stations depend on public relations people to tell them what news is?

    This is way over most local reporters' heads. Besides, dont we have team coverage underway because of the COLD story? TV doesn't multitask, ya know.

    ReplyDelete
  31. What does Herman Cain say about this matter?

    ReplyDelete
  32. So that if it was a bomb it would bliw up the airport so Sly & company would really be able to say they HAD to build a new airport.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Sorry, 5:53. You can't land a 767 going 600 mph at 37,000 feet in 30 miles.

    Now what is the closest, least busy, least weather impacted, airport capable of handling a 767?

    ReplyDelete
  34. What a dumb bunch of shit, someone left their flash drive in the bathroom (while taking a shit) and it turns into a bomb threat?, that is pathetic !! the only bomb threat was the terd dropped in the toilet!! What a sick joke!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Umm 2:50? You slow the plane down, put it into a circle and land it in the Quad Cities in less than 20 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  36. And if not the Quad Cities? Milwaukee would have been the next non weather impacted airport dipshit.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management