TKC EXCLUSIVE AND BREAKING NEWS INTERVIEW WITH JONATHAN STERNBERG - THE GOP CANDIDATE FOR DOWNTOWN KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI DISTRICT 24!!!



MO House Rep. Mike Talboy getting out of politics and into lobbying has not only created a contentious contest among Democrats but also reveals the changing demographics and voting habits in our Downtown Kansas City hotbed of political activity.

The current political upheaval represents an opportunity for Kansas City Attorney Jonathan Sternberg.



Mr. Sternberg is running unopposed in the Republican Primary for District 24 while Democrats Sarah Gillooly and Judy Morgan slug it out in a race that's getting increasingly heated every day.

RECENTLY, MR. STERNBERG WAS KIND ENOUGH TO ANSWER A FEW TKC QUESTIONS IN THIS IN-DEPTH AND EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!!!

Check it:

TKC: What made made you decide to run?!?!

"I’ve enjoyed representing area Republican voters for the past few years in the Jackson County Republican Committee and the Missouri State Republican Committee. I decided to run for the 24th House District to bring my perspective to all the area’s citizens of all political stripes. As a citizen, an attorney, and a small business owner, both the present, dismal economic and employment environment and the top-down view of government that many of our leaders of all parties seem to have concerns me greatly. I believe the solution is less government, not more. Government cannot create jobs or grow the economy. What it can – and must – do, however, is provide a free, open, just, and predictable environment in which private industry and personal ingenuity can flourish, fostering businesses and individuals to choose how to live their lives and conduct their relationships with each other.

TKC: Notice Mr. Sternberg's appeal to the "Liberty-based" crowd given that they're a growing force in Kansas City politics.

I bring the citizens of the 24th District a liberty-based alternative to politics as usual. I firmly believe that, though Missouri is the freest state in the country, it can and must be more so. My goal as state representative is to keep my constituents (be they Republican, Democrat, or independent) as free as possible, protecting our liberties from attacks on both the left and the right. I oppose “crony capitalism,” which is all too rampant here and throughout America. Government should not pick winners and losers, be it through prohibitionism, direct contributions, tax increases, tax incentives, or otherwise. Rather, government should foster the free and open market by protecting its existence, keeping people safe and providing a lawful means to quell disputes with the minimum possible intrusiveness. Competition will thrive – and jobs and the economy with it. In protecting freedoms and lessening the burdensomeness of government by overhauling restrictive and byzantine regulation, we all win.

TKC: In this important passage Jonathan Sternberg addresses his chances in an area that Kansas City Democrats have traditionally controlled for more than a half century.

I am not oblivious to the obstacles to my candidacy. I know that the former 37th District seat was heavily Democratic. But especially after the creation of the new 24th District, which spans from Downtown, through Midtown and Westport to the Plaza, there is no reason the seat should be or will be so limited simply because there’s an “R” after my name, nor have I observed this when speaking to constituents in the district. In any case, the proliferation of many voices with many ideas is important to the political process. The marketplace of ideas should be as open, free, and varied as the actual marketplace.
#######

Obviously, we'll be watching Mr. Sternberg's campaign closely in what seems to be one of Kansas City's hottest upcoming political contests for control of Downtown KC and a bit beyond.

DEVELOPING . . .

Comments

  1. A change of pace TKC.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another stupid-ass free marketer.

    When will they learn?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's the viable alternative? Collectivist central planning?

      There is no free market in MO or the US except in no reserve auctions, garage sales, flea markets and Craigslist. Every other aspect has elements of central planning either through regulations, tax preferences, direct and indirect subsidization and manipulated fiat currency.

      Delete
  3. You didn't ask him what he thinks of unsolicited bulk e-mail?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 6:48- Those aren't free markets, either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are about the only things we have that even marginally resembles free markets.

      Delete
  5. When it comes to government vs. free market, it's not an either-or proposition. It's really a how-much-of-which situation. Each has areas where they perform well and where they fail. The key is using the right one in the right amounts.

    Pups like Sternberg may not remember when American rivers caught on fire and land contaminated with industrial chemicals was repurposed for residential use without clean-up. But I do. And I know that was the free market at work and it took government to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When it comes to government vs. free market, it's not an either-or proposition. It's really a how-much-of-which situation. Each has areas where they perform well and where they fail. The key is using the right one in the right amounts.

    Pups like Sternberg may not remember when American rivers caught on fire and land contaminated with industrial chemicals was repurposed for residential use without clean-up. But I do. And I know that was the free market at work and it took government to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When was that again, refresh my memory?

      Delete
    2. When was the time of free markets and fiery rivers? It sounds amazing.

      Delete
  7. Somehow I don't think some junior state rep is going to have much effect on what goes on in Jeff City regardless of what academic philosophy he or she might have.
    It's special interest pay-to-play with any serious public policy left on the cutting room floor.
    In any case, the public couldn't care less about any of these candidates and the candidtes aren't discussing anything but each other.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very refreshing, TKC! Not politics as usual indeed.

    7:27/7:31 - He said "keeping people safe with the minimum possible intrusiveness." I don't think he'd vote to prevent government from precluding industrial pollution. Get real.

    7:34 - This candidate doesn't seem to be discussing the others. He doesn't have to. Democrat race is union hack vs. feminist hack. Intelligent centrist businessman who already won the GOP nom doesn't have to bash either one.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Free markets" does not mean laws do not apply. It is an economic theory that the state should provide a legal framework and the private sector provides goods and services.
    Every person and every business pollutes. Debating lawful levels is a legitimate job of lawmakers. Giving out TIFs, tax abatements, film credits and every other Chamber of Commerce scheme is not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Free markets recognize that individuals have preferences and power rests upon the individual through their preferences. Markets will constantly seek to align themselves to those preferences, resulting in efficiencies and accurate pricing. Any interventions, particularly state interventions, distort the market and strip power from the individual.

      Delete
  10. Nice "original" answers from Mr. Sternberg. They sound a lot like these:

    http://midwestdemocracy.com/candidates/jonathan-sternberg/survey-results/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why do you cover the RACES, Tony, but never cover the LEGISLATURE?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A Jeff City basement blogger/reporter isn't in the budget yet for the TKC media empire.

      Delete
  12. After 50 years of the same old same old, hacks, and cronies this fellow at least gives a glimmer of hope and sits as an oasis in the Vanity Fair we call Kansas City.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If Sternberg's opinions is what passes for "moderate" now, it is not surprising why this country is damned to low growth and high unemployment.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I like Sternberg a lot. He took the city to court over the cigarette ban; a valiant effort.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wow, what a breath of well-written fresh air compared to the rest of the usual drivel that passes for area politics! Thanks TKC!

    It's been a long time (Dick Berkeley?) since a preppy socialite ran for local office around here. This guy's gonna make this interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 7:47- Nothing in the post suggests anything about Sternberg seeking to relax existing standards.

    The comment was in regards to his philosophical approach to emerging issues.

    Factory farms, and especially CAFO's, are a very real problem in many areas of Missouri.

    And the staunchest of Republicans (e.g. Richter of Smithfield et. al.) are pushing hard (i. e. donating money to politicians) to prevent any standards associated with their "waste lagoons". Additionally, you have the pay day loan industry that has thoroughly co-opted Jeff City into allowing their predatory lending schemes. How about marijuana reform? Let liberty and individual freedom rule? Prostitution? Euthanasia?

    What about people the free market leaves behind, such as those who depend on orphan drugs? Or childhod immunization laws?

    All these fuckin' free marketers and liberty lovers only want to talk in economic terms. But they never seem want to grind it out on the social issues.

    Remember the golden rule of free enterprise- He who has the gold makes the rules. Which is all fine and good- until they come for you and yours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When the bum on the street approaches me and asks for a dollar, I kindly refer him to talk to the state about it as they have already confiscated my dollar on his behalf. Because politicians decided that I wasn't exercising my powers to their liking, they decided to take that power from me (along with my wealth) and execute them for me by giving contracts to their friends and family, campaign donors, etc.

      How is the current system working out by the way? Are we helping people up or just giving handouts like medical care to my neighbor's children, my neighbor who lives in a 5 year old $275k home and drives a new BMW suv? Or the couple I know who purposely stays unmarried so they can collect childcare assistance? Or my elderly neighbor who is addicted to sleeping pills and narcotic pain meds that Mediscam pays for?

      It's amazing that I can even breathe today without a jack-booted gov't thug standing over me telling me to breathe. How did humans ever survive on this planet so long? Maybe Elizabeth Warren can tell me. I think I'll write her a letter.

      Delete
    2. I believe your "golden rule of free enterprise" is actually the status quo of economic interventionist politicians. The ones who write rules and regulations to that grant unnatural monopolies or at least stifle the marginal competitors because compliance costs are too high. The ones that hand out tax subsidies, tax credits or tax abatements to handpicked businesses. The ones that distort pricing and preference in the market through subsidization (Chevy Volt, "healthcare," corn syrup, ethanol, etc.). Yes that is the golden rule. Pay to play and thou shall be rewarded.

      Delete
  17. 9:30- Laughable but for the stupidity of the comment.

    Free markets don't empower individuals. They empower those who manipulate opinion and exploit the ignorance of individuals and herd mentality.

    Don't think so? You're less bright than I initially gave you credit for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What then empowers the individual? Government mandates enforced through coercion, confiscation and violence? Taking justly acquired wealth from one individual and handing it to another? Who determines who is worthy of receiving another's wealth and who determines whose justly acquired wealth should be confiscated? You can throw insults but where are your solutions?

      Delete
    2. Are you saying that all people except you are too stupid or ignorant to act in their own self-interest based upon their own preference? That our wise rulers should decide for us, for our own protection?

      Delete
  18. So business manipulate opion and exploit ignorance but politicians don't? In the short run companies can advertise heavily and sell an inferior product or service. But in the long run people figure it out. Just ask GM. But in the long run the same incompetent crooks are always in government, providing inferior service.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 11:27 - Not if we elect Sternberg. He's very bright, friendly, and honest. Even more unusual for a lawyer!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Nice guy. But no chance of winning.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I can't decide if this guy is power-hungry, wants some attention, or is simply not as smart as his resume would lead you to believe.

    State Reps.... bottom of the barrel. Anyone worth a shit would run for something meaningful. Just a title while accomplishing things on the side...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is your definition of meaningful?

      Delete
  22. None of the above, 1:02. I know Sternberg, and he's genuinely sincere about helping people and guarding Missouri law against ideas and people who would harm it. A ten-minute conversation with him will wow you. He's gotta be one of the brightest people in the state. Amazing knowledge of history, law, and government (especially the constitution).

    ReplyDelete
  23. That's what we need, 1:24. Thought police.

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Amazing knowledge of history, law, and government (especially the constitution)."-1:24

    Great. What does he know about people or serving them?

    ReplyDelete
  25. 1:26, not thought police; a voice for liberty and common sense in a chamber full of crazies.

    1:29, ask his clients. He has a great sense of people and serving them. Friendly and genuinely caring.

    ReplyDelete
  26. He's not running the Service Desk at Walmart, he will be a lawmaker. We need some smarts in the legislature which clearly doesn't have much.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Jason Kander is "smart". And yound. And an attorney. THAT's really served KC well. Not to mention how his ethics "reforms" only watered down the existing laws and provided new measures to circumvent tranarency.

    No, these young, smart attorney-types are justly tidal climbers ready to step hard on anyone and anything that gets in their way.

    ReplyDelete
  28. And most of those low achiever legislative MORONS NEED to be stepped on.

    I think most of them run for legislature because they don't have the smarts to get a REAL JOB! And then they hope to stay there.

    Anybody OVER QUALIFIED for that job... well vote for them!

    Sadly most media does
    doesn't cover the legislature except in Columbia. KC, STL are too preoccupied with local black-on-black crimes for easy ratings.

    WHERE IS THE STAR AND THE POST DISPATCH????

    ReplyDelete
  29. So you don't want an intelligent and hardworking guy in office? I know that he thought long and hard about this decision and was fully aware it's a thankless job...but his interest in the state and people in the state is pretty overwhelming. He's constantly concerned about MO's reputation as a place of true freedom. What more could want than that?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want more oligarchs and overlords. I cherish my role as a host to the parasitic bureaucracy of The State. I love paying for the privilege of earning a living and paying rent on our shared property. Hooray for serfdom!!!

      Delete
  30. Jonathan has my vote! I already liked him. After watching the two fems beat each other up, I like him even more.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

TKC COMMENT POLICY:

Be percipient, be nice. Don't be a spammer. BE WELL!!!

- The Management