Let's start with first impressions: I think John Crawford is nearly as nice and smart as God but I wonder if he'll be crucified in Kansas City's nasty political scene.
Thanks to the power of the Internets I was able to arrange a meeting with Crawford and talk about a variety of Kansas City issues and how his campaign for Council might address so many local problems.
MAKE NO MISTAKE: JOHN CRAWFORD IS A SERIOUS CHALLENGER TO COUNCIL LADY INCUMBENT BETH GOTTSTEIN!!! SO, I WANTED TO TALK TO HIM AND SEE WHAT MY HOMEGIRL WAS UP AGAINST!!!
While he has never held elected office before, his resume lists a great many community economic development partnerships that would inspire envy among most politicos. TKC Readers can check out Crawford's Resume for themselves.
The Highlights from the resume:
"Authored Missouri's Community Improvement District Law; gained its adoption by State Legislature."
"Created Kansas City’s most successful program model for housing rehab. With completion of $60 million TIF-funded Midtown commercial redevelopment (Home Depot, Costco, Westport’s Sun Fresh-anchored commercial center), designed major housing rehab program in surrounding neighborhood using surplus project revenue."
"Initiated and successfully pursued creation of one of Kansas City’s largest, most significant Historic Districts on the National Register of Historic Places — the Crossroads Freight District (honored with 2001 Preserve Missouri Award)."
And on the subject of community involvement, Crawford is a member of the Ivanhoe Neighborhood Council and Crestwood Homes Association.
Crawford started our talk with a story of how he re-enrolled in college after serving in Vietnam and working dead end jobs. He finally figured out that working with public/private partnerships was a big part of what he wanted to the with his career. He then mentioned his childhood in the Northeast U.S. and noted how his first hand contact with urban development changed the course of his life.
"I witnessed how my community was transformed by economic development close to my childhood home," Crawford said. "That offered the groundwork for my desire to try an help communities through my work."
Probably the most promising thing about Crawford's candidacy is his focus on building a consensus, demonstrated among groups with which he has worked. Crawford emphasized his desire to create "A climate of cooperation" on the City Council. Obviously, that would be a far cry of where things stand today.
Now the downside:
Even Crawford admits that he hasn't mastered soundbytes. Worse still, his experience in economic development/community based projects might be more in tune with another era in Kansas City's economic timeline.
Crawford described the proposed Downtown Hotel as a "project worth doing" much to my disappointment. Put simply, I doubt the economy is going to come around any time soon and spending our way to prosperity via development has yet to prove effective in Kansas City.
Still, it's hard avoid being persuaded by Crawford's optimism. Even worse, he's not just doing a nice guy act. He started the conversation by noting that he isn't running "Against" Council Lady Gottstein. In fact, he admits to admiring the work of the Council in general and noting that they are "a group of the most capable people a local governing body has ever seen."
Like it or not, that kind of talk doesn't unseat an incumbent.
And as I'm about to wrap up this post I realize that in this race with a really nice Irish-Catholic guy running against Beth, my leade could be misconstrued by stupid people. On the subject of Crawford's impending peril, I was actually referring to mean-spirited political watchers like myself who will undoubtedly take potshots at the Council hopeful. This is Crawford's first attempt at public office and I really do think he's unprepared for how nasty things can get. But I digress . . .
While Crawford's campaign theme of cooperation and consensus is inspiring. Right now the Kansas City electorate is awash in broke people who are pissed off. Without question, Crawford has helped lead the way to some of this town's most successful developments. Now, it remains to be seen if he can create a viable platform for his ideas amid a rather contentious Kansas City political scene.
A good man. He should have been named the President of EDC during the Barnes administration.
ReplyDeleteAnyone but the idiot Beth.
ReplyDeleterumor mill or not, all he has had to do to understand how nasty kc politics can get is read this blog.
ReplyDeletetony is particularly guilty in the mudslinging and using innuendos and false kick-ass tipster tips, to raise the rabble.
Strange, I thought Anne McGregor would be Beth's competition. Nice guys vs. pissed off people? While John Crawford may be a nice guy, at least he has an impressive resume loaded with impressive accomplishments as opposed to the failures of both Anne and Beth. Nice guys finish last? Not always.
ReplyDeleteCommunity Improvement Districts in Kansas City just increase taxes on citizens so business owners can shift operating costs. They do this without a vote and input of the citizens. They use this tax for landscaping, snow removal, etc.
ReplyDeleteClass story needing a JUMP!
ReplyDelete8:20 am-you are correct. CID's do increase the taxes on citizens. However, what you fail to mention is that once the bonds issued to fund the CID's mature, that money goes to the city's general fund-normally-leaving business owners to then pay those taxes themselves. That would be the attraction for the incentive portion of redevelopment projects.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the deal, Tony? The guy looks white. How can he be any good?
ReplyDeleteI hear his great-great-grandfather owned slaves.
ReplyDelete-yawn- Another pro-development type that would rather use tax dollars for a hotel than for roads. Isn't that old yet?
ReplyDeleteAnne all the way folks.
ReplyDelete8:49 their are no bonds look at cid expenditures at kcmo.org. goto city clerk type in brookside, red bridge, skelly, landing any cid and see how money is being spent.
ReplyDeleteI thought he was Jan's opponent?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I have never seen any bonds for a CID; it's all sales tax and property assessments. WITH A HEAVY EMPHASIS ON SALES TAXES.
ReplyDeleteCIDs = Same old corporate welfare schemes that are strangling this town's finances.
Yeah, I have never seen any bonds for a CID; it's all sales tax and property assessments. WITH A HEAVY EMPHASIS ON SALES TAXES.
ReplyDeleteCIDs = Same old corporate welfare schemes that are strangling this town's finances.
I like John Crawford. Our district deserves competent representation. As for the pro development side, I submit that he was working in what we were pushing. The Go-Go hyper fueled economy lulled us into a feeling of never having to pay the bill. Well, here's the bill. I think Crawford has the knowledge to see deep into the problem and help turn around our local government.
ReplyDeleteNo wire hangers!!!!
ReplyDeleteCity Council candidates so far: all pro-establishment types and one pink-haired Libertarian.
ReplyDeleteWe tried self proclaimed outsiders and refugees from social service agencies. All we got was a pot of crap. At least these guys will know how to read a business plan.
ReplyDeleteWe tried self proclaimed outsiders and refugees from social service agencies. All we got was a pot of crap. At least these guys will know how to read a business plan.
ReplyDeleteI like him but Beth will beat him to a bloody pulp and turn that white shirt into a red cloth.
ReplyDeleteJohn is one of the most intelligent, thoughtful and experienced people the city will ever get the chance to elect. He's the right man for the job, and I truly hope KC doesn't blow this opportunity to have a such a genuinely good-natured and smart leader in office.
ReplyDelete10:53 am-I apologize-my bad. I was referring to the Midtown Redevelopment Plan/Glover Plan which has been successful in revitalizing that part of Midtown. While John Crawford may or may not have been involved in that project, his resume suggests his experience would benefit the 4th district much more than that of any other candidate or incumbant seeking that council seat.
ReplyDelete12:04 the was a plan not a welfare program I can be for that.
ReplyDeleteCrawford came in when the Midtown Redevelopment Plan/Glover Plan was stalled. He got it built.
ReplyDeletePlease support my candidate, John Crawford.
ReplyDeleteHe's one of my Papa Grizzly's.
Beth is great for this city.
ReplyDeleteJohn is a great guy with impressive credentials. He is qualified and won't just "phone it in" at city hall. He's got my vote.
ReplyDeleteTKC's blog is just kinda like a nightly cocktail party where you operatives and bureaucrats just walk around and mingle, tho generally wearing masks so no one knows who's wielding the knives, right?
ReplyDeleteThe firefighters got Beth elected
ReplyDelete11:17 pm-if expressing our opinions means wielding knives then I suppose you're right.
ReplyDeleteJohn Crawford would make a very competent representative for our district, much more than we are getting from either representative at this time. He's got my vote.
ReplyDeleteCID's simply allow property owners to avoid paying taxes on improvements. Instead of raising the product costs a penny, and paying a tax(income), a tax is imposed on the consumer to pay for the improvement. That way it looks like the City is the bad guy(higher tax) while the developer pockets the improvement with out having to pay taxes. Sounds like a good deal to me $$$$$$$$$$
ReplyDelete